comrade circuits

Thank you for saving me time. I hate apps that do that.

Eh it's ok. You only get one question to test it out and the quality of the info you get in that one message is too lackluster to warrant going back for more, especially if you're into astrology and already know basic stuff. The aesthetic is fine. Some of the buttons are inexplicably disabled and the tooltips conflict with one another on the map, making it irritating to try to interact with the lines rendered on the map.

dead link. this one still leads to the site: https://relately.webflow.io/ logging in with Apple results in an error on the web app. Lots of friction just to even find and sign up for the product. Once you get a chance to test the product, you can try an onboarding conversation, which seems cool at first. But the bot constantly cuts you off midsentence (even if your sentence is only a few words). It's more frustrating than useful it seems, but the idea is cool. I hope it gets fleshed out and refined. It could be useful for people with acute or chronic social anxiety and people on the autism spectrum as well.

✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱2025-09-01 ✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱ After using this daily for nearly a week, I honestly *hate* it. I thought I had figured out how to exclude irrelevant things, but the AI doesn't respect the standard syntax consistently. Additionally, it will change your search terms to ones that may be more common, which is annoying if you're looking up uncommon shit. There is no way to follow up on queries to improve the output. There is no way to privately provide feedback. Editing queries is a pain in the ass, since the dev didn't put effort into the *main* element of the site: the input. I would not recommend using it for actual research of any kind, and AI is overkill for any other context. So, there is genuinely no reason to use this. ✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱2025-08-27 ✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱ I figured out that it supports some of the basic search syntax. Most of the results and generated commentary are irrelevant still though. It's annoying to use most of the time and comes off like a child in school trying to meet a word limit in their book report. ✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱2025-08-26 ✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱ The theme is white text on a white background. Bad first impression. Once you find the theme toggle to switch it to dark mode and can actually read anything on there, the output is more useful than Perplexity. Looking forward to seeing where the dev takes it. The API is way too expensive at $99/month (lowest price). There does not seem to be a way to exclude sources, so even if you say "avoid blogs" the majority of the source material is blog content. The developer brags about letting advertisers pollute the responses, and I assume this is why I cannot meaningfully exclude irrelevant results. For this reason, I am downgrading from 3 to 1 star. I have no tolerance for deception.

Currently in closed beta. If you're hoping to try it "today," that is not likely to occur. 1 star because it's not usable. Can't earn stars for a good rating if the user cannot use it. Also this is miscategorized as free. It's more like "free for now," which is moreso an issue with TAAFT than LittleBird. It's just annoying to be using this site in free mode and still get shit that is not free or that markets itself as free when it is not. In the meantime, PiecesOS is a freemium tool that appears similar.

The same level of quality you'll get from any generic AI chatbot on the market. There is no reason to pay for this if you already are paying for something like ChatGPT or Claude.

like the other person said, you have to pay. Normally, I wouldn't care, but this particular group advertised itself as free for quite some time. A lot of the materials about it still suggest it's free. And then it engages in basically the same pricing structure that people use this tool to protect themselves from.